No, the token copy is not going to be a remodeling token, as a result of the article it’s copying isn’t a remodeling double-faced card or a remodeling token.

707.8a If an impact creates a token that may be a copy of a remodeling everlasting or a remodeling double-faced card not on the battlefield, the ensuing token is a remodeling token that has each a entrance face and a again face. The traits of every face are decided by the copiable values of the identical face of the everlasting it’s a copy of, as modified by another copy results that apply to that everlasting. If the token is a replica of a remodeling everlasting with its again face up, the token enters the battlefield with its again face up. This rule doesn’t apply to tokens which are created with their very own set of traits and enter the battlefield as a replica of a remodeling everlasting attributable to a substitute impact.

The principles don’t appear to particularly outline “reworking everlasting”. Nonetheless, in all places else that “reworking” is talked about refers to “reworking double-faced card or reworking token”. So it’s a protected assumption {that a} “reworking everlasting” have to be both a remodeling double-faced card or reworking token, which Spark Double isn’t. If you happen to used Ceremony of Replication on Arcee as an alternative, then the tokens can be reworking.